One of the scarier scenarios I see unfolding today is the policies that are being proposed and voted on in DC that are based on global warming. For God’s sake, the only proof these Statists have are models of the future. Models are not proof. In fact, the UNIPCC models are so far off base vs. real observations that they should be mothballed. Certainly they should NOT be used for policy setting.

I dont know about you, but I get really tired of hearing all these jokers like Al Gore, and now Arnold, sucking up to federal science funding as long as they back the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) crowd who scream in the dark that the science is settled regarding man-made global warming. Please dont get me started on Dr. Hansen of NASA. He is a liar.

 http://www.heartland.org/publications/environment%20climate/article/26179/Hansen_Still_Embarrassing_NASA_After_2_Decades.html
I have placed a link here so you can see a large number of real academics agree with the statement below submitted to the American Physical Society. For a list of signatores, please click on the link and read their titles. Now then, the next time you hear ALGORE given a “pass” by media or even your friends, stop them, cry BULLSHIT at the top of your voice, then call me.

http://www.heartland.org/publications/environment%
20climate/article/26168/An_Open_Letter_to_the_Council_of_the_American_Physical_Society.html

Environment & Climate News > November 2009
Written By: Several Physicists
Published In: Environment & Climate News > November 2009
Publication date: 11/01/2009
Publisher: The Heartland Institute

——————————————————————————–

Regarding the National Policy Statement on Climate Change of the APS Council: An Open Letter to the Council of the American Physical Society

——————————————————————————–

As physicists who are familiar with the science issues, and as current and past members of the American Physical Society, we the undersigned urge the Council to revise its current statement* on climate change as follows, so as to more accurately represent the current state of the science:

Greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, accompany human industrial and agricultural activity. While substantial concern has been expressed that emissions may cause significant climate change, measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th and 21st century changes are neither exceptional nor persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today. In addition, there is an extensive scientific literature that examines beneficial effects of increased levels of carbon dioxide for both plants and animals.

Studies of a variety of natural processes, including ocean cycles and solar variability, indicate that they can account for variations in the Earth’s climate on the time scale of decades and centuries. Current climate models appear insufficiently reliable to properly account for natural and anthropogenic contributions to past climate change, much less project future climate.

The APS supports an objective scientific effort to understand the effects of all processes—natural and human—on the Earth’s climate and the biosphere’s response to climate change, and promotes technological options for meeting challenges of future climate changes, regardless of cause.